This is a continuation on yesterdays Part One article.
{the human vehicle.} David Icke briefly touches on the subject of death and spirit. In his lecture, he recants his mothers physical death versus the continuation of her energy:
“My mother is not in that coffin, my mother is not being cremated today. The vehicle that she used to experience this world and walk among us is what’s being cremated today.(…) she is infinite consciousness that cannot be destroyed.”
“All that was my mother has simply left this tiny frequency range that our eyes can perceive, and now exists in another.”
This statement can be interpreted and defined in many ways; religious, cosmic, metaphysically or scientifically. I agree wholeheartedly with his statement of energy not dying. For several millennia, cultures all around the world have tried to define the human energy by calling it several things: spirit, soul, chi, aura, psyche et cetera. It really doesn’t matter what it’s called, in the end things get a bit complicated when it comes to Death.
Do you completely die? Is there a spirit? Do you just rot in the ground along with anything that was ‘you’? Is there a Heaven? A Summerland? Hell? Purgatory? No one really knows.
Scientifically, all matter is ultimately made up of energy. Take for instance the world famousE=mc2. Although this law is in relation to kinetics, photons, atoms and the such, this can be applied to the current dilemma. In addition, the 1st Law of Thermodynamics states that energy can be transformed but cannot be created or destroyed. Put these two proven and undisputed laws together, and you prove that human energy cannot be destroyed. It’s as simple as that.
Einstein said:
“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest—a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison.”
Einstein’s statement goes into about three different subjects I could branch of on, but I’ll stick to the point I am trying to illustrate. For a moment, stop to think that the word ‘Universe’ is actually quite limiting…people just cannot fathom another plane or frequency of existence but this does not mean that it doesn’t exist.
Some cultures emphasize the transferring of energies in the form of past lives, also known as reincarnations. I believe strongly in this, as do most New Age and Eastern faiths. There has been some scientific research on this, but reincarnation is certainly more difficult to prove (or disprove, for that matter) than the other theories I discussed earlier. “We all know it can’t possibly be real, so therefore it isn’t real” is the common outlook on the matter, but on the same hand, people couldn’t fathom wireless communication not too long ago.
Do you agree? Disagree? I’d like to read your comments here on the blog or shoot a tweet over @crysticouture.
You pull together a lot of things. I really like that quote by Einstein. We are limited by our perceptions and our ability to imagine a different perceiving. Isn't "reincarnation" another construct that we impose on reality? Instead of realizing we are part of the whole at all times and there is not before or after life…at this moment we are the totality of our ancestors and descendants. Reincarnation lets us off the hook for the here & now. The present moment is all.